Thursday, May 30, 2019
Pornography on the Internet Essay -- social issues
Pornography on the net incomeThe net profit is a method of communication and a bloodline of information that is becoming popular among those who are interested in the information superhighway. The problem with this world we know as Cyberspace, the Net, or the Web is that some of this information, including pornographical textile and hate literature, is being accessible to minors. Did you know that 83.5% of the images available on the Internet are pornographical? Did you know that the Internets pornography and hate literature are available to curious children that happen to bump into them? One of the drawing features of the young Internet was its freedom. Its ...a rare example of a true, modern, functional anarchy...there are no official censors, no bosses, no board of directors, no stockholders (Sterling). Its an open forum where anyone can say anything, and the only thing holding them back is their witness conscience. This lawless atmosphere bothered many people, including Neb raska Senator James Exon. Exon proposed in July, 1994 that an amendment be added to the Telecommunications Reform Bill to regulate content on the Internet. His device was rejected at the time, besides after persistence and increased support, his proposal evolved into the Communications Decency Act (CDA), part of the 1996 Telecommunications Reform Act The Internet has changed the world by creating advertising, information, and businesses. However, there are the few bad apples in the Internet that have information, literature, graphics and images that have been deemed inappropriate for minors. Therefore, many people feel the Internet should be censored by the Government. The Government owns and operates the Internet and its agencies are responsible for what is on the Internet. However, for the parents with minors that are concerned about what their kids see- they should go out and get software package to censor the Internet. Dont ruin everyone elses fun. Why should I have to be a p easant of the Government tyranny over the Internet? The people that worry about their kids and make the Government worry about it and pass legislation on censorship are the people that are excessively damn lazy to buy Internet Censorship software programs for their PERSONAL computers, NOT the entire United States. The Government wants censorship, but a segment of the Internets population does not. The Communi... ... the user would exercise control of the information available on interactive media instead of the government or network operators. The CDA criminalizes knowingly transmiting or making available information on interactive media that can be accessed just as easily by wondering the isles of a book store. It also criminalizes unbecoming speech that is transmitted electronically between two consenting adults. i.e. Email. The punishment for such a crime can be up to 2 days in prison and/or a $250,000 fine. The Communications Decency Act is unconstitutional by banning speech that is protected by the First Amendment in a medium in which the user is giving the ability to select what he or she does or does not want to receive. The government gives citizens the privilege of using the internet, but it has never given them the right to use it. If we have a Constitution and, supposedly, a First Amendment- why is the Government using legislation to stop us from expressing ourselves? We seem to be a ironic and paradox country. We didnt want to be the first to use nuclear weapons and the atomic bomb, but were the first and, so far to present day, the last to use them.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.